Problems with national filenames

Advertisement

orb
Guest

Problems with national filenames

FAR works with strings in OEM codepage, but plugin trying to work with them as if they were in ANSI codepage - as a result there is problem with russian filenames for example. WinSCP standalone application works with them correctly.

Reply with quote

Advertisement

wtiger
Guest

Здравствуйте. И все же, как заставить плагин winscp в фаре перекодировать имена в ANSI, а то русские имена корежатся. Мало того, что они из юникода конвертятся, так еще и тут одна ступень сопротивления.. ;)

-- Edward.

Reply with quote

Guest

I confirm the problem.

I have a server with UTF8 encoding. If I use winscp with "Server does not use UTF8" off then everything works fine. But in the FAR plugin the names are shown incorrectly.

This is really related to ANSI vs OEM.

Reply with quote

Advertisement

Guest

martin wrote:

This is really related to ANSI vs OEM.
Sure, it is.

Is there a chance that it will be fixed in the next version? :)

Do you need some more info/testing or something else?

Thanks.

Reply with quote

Advertisement

victor
Guest

martin wrote:

E.G. wrote:

And how it goes?
I've implemented this last week. Give me a few days for release.

oops, no changes in 1.6.1 version :(
we're waiting :)

Reply with quote

Splinty
Donor
Joined:
Posts:
33
Location:
Russia, Kurgan

Народ, при подключении по протоколу SFTP (FTP) никаких проблем нет, а вот по SCP мал мало да. Я пока использую WinSCP с коннектом по SFTP и пометкой коннекта "UTF-8 завсегда".

Ну и не забудьте на хосте, вообще-говоря, сделать
convmv -r -f сКакойКодировкойЗалилиФайлы -е utf-8 *

К примеру я заливал немало FTP-плугином FAR, он лил в cp1251
соотвественно прогнать начиная с корневого надо
convmv -r -f cp1251 -е utf-8 *

Будет круто!
Но при коннекте по SCP это не поможет всё равно. И всё же файлы с русскими именами на хосте лучше хранить в UTF-8, спросите у гуру.
_________________
Sors mea Jesus!

Reply with quote

martin
Site Admin
martin avatar
Joined:
Posts:
41,441
Location:
Prague, Czechia

victor wrote:

oops, no changes in 1.6.1 version :(
we're waiting :)
Hm. I believe that this is fixed since 1.6 beta already...

Reply with quote

Advertisement

You can post new topics in this forum