Forum » .NET assembly / COM library »

Post a reply

Options
Add an Attachment

If you do not want to add an Attachment to your Post, please leave the Fields blank.

(maximum 10 MB; please compress large files; only common media, archive, text and programming file formats are allowed)

Options

Topic review

martin

Thanks for sharing your findings.
Though there's only single line difference between 5.5.2 and 5.5.1 assemblies. And the line should affect COM interface only:
https://winscp.net/tracker/1134
So it rather looks like a local problem of yours.
biop

I play around with version 5.5.1 and 5.5.2.

C# example with version 5.5.1 EXE and dot net assembly: There is delay in startup.

C# example with version 5.5.2 EXE and dot net assembly: There is no delay in startup!

So if you use dot net assembly, use 5.5.2 instead of 5.5.1.
biop

:oops: :oops:
Sorry I figure out. Somehow I am using version 5.5.1 of WinSCP.exe but version 5.5.2 of WinSCPnet.dll!!!
biop

:shock: :shock:
If the C# example does not have any delay in running, why I am seeing this? Could this be anything related to server setting? Firewall blocking something? I use the WinSCP.exe to connect to destination server from my local machine. There is no such delay! But I run the C# example, even in the destination server, it takes 30 seconds before the first statement!! :roll:

By the way, at the same time, I will use a C++ program to use COM method to call in the dot net assembly. I hope I can figure out how to do.
martin

biop wrote:

I get the source code in https://winscp.net/download/winscp552source.zip/download. I will start running debug mode on this.

[Edit]: Hum... I am using Visual Studio... And the source code is in C++ builder? Do not know how to integrate with Visual Studio...

You are interested in dotnet\WinSCPnet.csproj only. That's C# Visual Studio project.

So are you saying when you start that C# example, it returns (almost) immediately?

Sure.
biop

Thanks for your reply.

:oops: Sorry that I cross post to the StackExchange because I want to get more people to answer on this.

I get the source code in https://winscp.net/download/winscp552source.zip/download. I will start running debug mode on this.

[Edit]: Hum... I am using Visual Studio... And the source code is in C++ builder? Do not know how to integrate with Visual Studio...

So are you saying when you start that C# example, it returns (almost) immediately?
martin

Re: .NET Assembly starts slowly (~30 sec)

WinSCP .NET assembly does not have any expensive initialization code, so I really do not know what can cause a delay on your system. I haven't seen it before. Did you try to download assembly source code and debug it?
biop

.NET Assembly starts slowly (~30 sec)

Dear all,

I am testing out the C# example in https://winscp.net/eng/docs/library#csharp. I find out when it starts up, it takes about 30 seconds or so before initialization of SessionOptions object. Why is there this delay? And how can I reduce the delay?

I am required to write a C++/CLI program using WinSCP. I follow that C# example and have converted it (manually) to C++/CLI version of it. Likewise, when the program reaches the initialization of SessionOptions object, it takes 30 seconds already. Why? Can it be shortern?

For C# program, if I comment out everything in Main() but have only one WriteLine('Done') statement, the program returns immediately.
For C# program, if I have only the initialization of SessionOptions and that WriteLine() statement, the program takes about 32 seconds to return.

For C++/CLI program, if I comment out everything in Main() and even the #using "WinSCPnet.dll" but have that one WriteLine() statement, the program returns immediately.
For C++/CLI program, if I uncomment #using "WinSCPnet.dll", and have 
WinSCP::SessionOptions ^ sftpSessionOptions = nullptr;

WinSCP::SessionOptions ^ sftpSession = nullptr;

Console::WriteLine("Done");

the word "Done" appears at least 30 seconds after start up of program.

Documentation

Support

Associations

Follow Us