Forum » Support and Bug Reports »

Post a reply

Before posting, please read how to report bug or request support effectively.

Bug reports without an attached log file are usually useless.

Options
Add an Attachment

If you do not want to add an Attachment to your Post, please leave the Fields blank.

(maximum 10 MB; please compress large files; only common media, archive, text and programming file formats are allowed)

Options

Topic review

!BRNDMG

just registered and dropped you a mail - thank you! :)
martin

Re: S3 Support for other S3 storages than amazon

OK, I see.

Can you send me an email, so I can send you back a development version of WinSCP for testing (once I have anything to test)? Please include link back to this topic in your email. Also note in this topic that you have sent the email. Thanks.

You will find my address (if you log in) in my forum profile.
ibrndmg

Re: S3 Support for other S3 storages than amazon

If I use the default port (one cannot change it, no option available): I cannot connect.

If I write the port manually in the host field like: 192.168.0.1:9021
I can connect, but on browsing errors occour
martin

Re: S3 Support for other S3 storages than amazon

So do you mean that if you use the default port, you can connect, but browsing does not work?
And that you believe that if you could connect to port 9021, it would work?
So why does the server accept a connection on the default port?
ibrndmg

S3 Support for other S3 storages than amazon

Hi WinSCP Team,

New Site => File Protocol => Amazon S3:
No Port configuration available.

I tried to connect to Dell ECS by using port 9021, which works on initial connection, when I write the port into the "Host Name" field. The root folders are listed fine, but browsing doesn't work.

Would be nice, if you could add a "Port" option on S3 Protocol.

Thank you and have a nice day!

Documentation

Support

Associations

Follow Us